Editorial policy

Radiant Cycling Review aims to make cycling topics clear, careful and useful to read. We distinguish explanation from opinion, avoid overstating what a general article can establish and revise material when a reader points out a problem.

Accuracy and clarity

We check wording, definitions and the logic of an article before publication, and make uncertainty clear when a subject does not have one universal answer. Articles are written to inform general readers, not to replace a qualified assessment of a bicycle or riding situation.

Independence

Editorial choices are guided by reader interest and the publication's subject. A commercial relationship does not guarantee coverage or a favourable mention. We keep editorial decisions distinct from partner arrangements.

Corrections

If you think something is wrong or confusing, use the Contact page and identify the article and the passage in question. We review correction requests, update material where warranted and make the change clear when the correction affects the reader's understanding.

Partner material and illustrations

Paid placements, supplied material and other partner content are labelled so readers can distinguish them from independent editorial coverage. Some illustrations may be generated with artificial intelligence; when that applies, the illustration is identified accordingly.